probes, and by the disruption of xylem tissue associated with their placement. These
perturbations produce a systematic underestimation in the measured heat-pulse velocity
(Cohen et al., 1981; Green and Clothier, 1988). Consequently, the heat-pulse velocity
must be corrected for the probe-induced effects of wounding. This correction can be done
empirically (e.g. Cohen et al., 1981), or it can be based on sound physical principals,
using an equation of the form:
(2)
where
V
c
[m s
-1
] is the corrected heat-pulse velocity and
V
is the raw heat-pulse velocity
given by Eq. (1). The correction coefficients
a
,
b
, and
c
have been derived by Swanson
and Whitfield (1981) from numerical solutions of Marshall’s (1958) equations, for
various wound sizes. The full range of correction factors are listed in Table 1. These
correction factors can also be seen in the ANALYSIS program, HPV-2000.FOR, which is
described later. The use of Eq. (2) puts the heat-pulse method on a sound theoretical
basis, and uses physical principals rather than an empirical calibration to obtain the best
estimate of the heat-pulse velocity.
Comments to this Manuals